Friday, 15 September 2017

Cry me a paddy-field

Myanmar (formerly Burma) is under severe attack from the "international community" (read NWO Globo-homos) for so-called genocide against the Rohingya Muslims. The United Nations calls them the “most persecuted minority group in the world”. Imagine that. Also amazing to see Muslims not getting on with their neighbours, isn't it? All respectable opinion, every 'international body', all the mainstream media see this conflict as truly Manichean. There are the good guys (Muslims) and the bad guys (Buddhists) and nothing in between. And whenever you encounter such unanimity from such sources you know that a new mind-fuck is underway. And the Rohingya campaign is no exception.
You'll be amazed to learn that the Rohingya Muslims have always had bad relations with their Buddhist neighbours. This was fuelled by not alone traditional Muslim out-group hostility but by massive long-standing growth in their numbers, derived not just from breeding like rabbits but through mass cross-border migration from what's now Bangladesh (previously East Pakistan and India before that). SOP in such circumstances is for Muslims to create their own Dar-al-Islam (even though they fled their previous one) which inevitably leads to clashes with the natives. This does not apply of course in cucked Europe where the locals just roll over.

But the Burmese Buddhists didn't roll over and widespread communal unrest resulted. "The massive rate at which they entered Arakan was a cause of great resentment among the local population, among whom a strong sense of nationalism developed." The problem was somewhat manageable until the onset of WW II when the British got the idea of enlisting the Rohingya in the war against Japan. Armed to the teeth by the Brits they duly went off to war. But against their fellow countrymen, not against the Japs. And with 
more than 20,000 fatalities they weren't holding back. 

Here's one contemporaneous account: "By night fall we could see rolling flames on the Maungdaw side from Taknaff Town across the wide Naff River. Later we heard the depressing news that tens of thousands of Bengali-Muslims had entered Maungdaw after the town was abandoned and burned down the whole town after taking away everything removable from the Yakhine houses including rice, cooking oil, salt, and every single piece of furniture. All the Yakhine villages, there were hundreds of them Buddhist villages, on the extremely fertile strip south of Maungdaw Town between the Naff River and Mayu Ranges were completely wiped out by the rioting Bengali Muslims within few days."

As you can imagine this didn't exactly endear them to the Burmese, especially as the mass cross-border influx continued unabated after the war. In response the Government imposed severe restrictions including a law that gave national citizenship to only those Burmese who could prove having ancestors residing in the country before British colonial rule. Which strikes me as a thoroughly splendid idea. But of course it's the antithesis of everything our NWO Globo-homo overlords stand for. Hence the international hue and cry.

We can now expect the invading army of European-based head-choppers (rested and replenished courtesy of the European taxpayers after their exertions in Syria and Iraq) to head off to Myanmar on their latest jihad. Aided and abetted once again by the peace-loving Gulf states and the freedom-loving Western democracies.

Just watch.

Tuesday, 12 September 2017

Lord Of The Flies in Paradise


Developments in the Caribbean island of St. Martin after hurricane Irma surely substantiate William Golding's pessimistic take on human nature. It was Lord Of The Flies redux. (As an aside, I see there are plans afoot for a remake of the earlier film versions but this time with an all-female cast. This in turn has provided the feminazis with yet another opportunity to display their unfathomable ignorance, hypocrisy and inconsistency. For decades we've been beaten over the head with demands for women to take on the roles traditionally played by men. We're all the same you see. But now we're indignantly told that girls would never turn into little savages like the boys did.)

Even the New York Slimes came perilously close to honest reporting. "In the few, long days since Irma pummeled the northeast Caribbean, killing more than two dozen people..... the social fabric has begun to fray in some of the hardest-hit communities At dawn, people began to gather, quietly planning for survival". To which any normal person would respond "well why the hell did they not quietly plan for survival before the storm hit?" As one local Dutch guy commented 'you can fill a cooler with $20 in rice and beans and eat for 3 weeks'. In any event 'quietly planning' actually meant opportunistically looting (or as the Slimes put it 'ad hoc provisioning'!). "They started with the grocery stores, scavenging what they needed for sustenance: water, crackers, fruit. But by nightfall on Thursday, what had been a search for food took a more menacing turn, as groups of people, some of them armed, swooped in and took whatever of value was left: electronics, appliances and vehicles." “All the food is gone now,” Jacques Charbonnier, a 63-year-old resident of St. Martin, said in an interview on Sunday. “People are fighting in the streets for what is left.” Latest news is that the local zoo is being plundered and the animals eaten.

We all know that blacks cannot sustain a techno-industrial society, let alone create one. In natural disasters blacks loot and pillage, Whites prepare and rescue. Blacks survive only as parasites, which is why they follow - all the time loudly complaining  - their White prey wherever we flee. But here's a question. What happens if and when YT is unable or unwilling to sustain them? What happens if and when White societies get over-run by Third World bottom feeders and become Third World themselves or when and if the financial money-printing ponzi that now artificially sustains us finally collapses?

Well, these events, and those with Katrina, have given us a pretty good idea.

Friday, 8 September 2017

Pessimism? I rest my case

Many on here took me to task a few posts back when I expressed despair at the power of International Jewry. But the approach of a new September 11 anniversary starkly reminds us of that power because 9/11 (arguably the most traumatic event in American history since the Civil War) was a blatant false flag with Israeli hands all over it. The official explanation is so implausible as to be almost laughable. Yet at an official level it has never been subjected to any meaningful examination. Any single one of the following blow open the official case, taken in combination they render it  literally  beyond belief.

1. The collapse of WTC7, the only steel framed building in history for which fire - and a very small fire at that - was allegedly the sole cause of its collapse. This preposterous explanation, taken to its logical conclusion would result in all such buildings throughout the country being closed down. None were. (And the collapse was described in graphic detail by the BBC twenty minutes before it happened!).

2. That Larry Silverstein, despite his "pull it" (a common term for a demolition) admission live on TV has never been called on to even explain his remark, let alone been charged with mass murder.

3. That the 'dancing Israelis', subsequently revealed to be Mossad operatives, openly admitted they were present on the day 'to record the event'. Self-evidently they knew it was going to take place yet they were released by US authorities while the Israeli Government were never called on to explain their role.

4. And one of my own favorites, the 'terrorist passport', miraculously surviving the plane explosion and subsequently found in perfect condition in the midst of thousands of tons of smoldering rubble.

There's a ton of additional evidence to show that 911 was a false flag and that Israel together with the mainly Jewish Neocons were behind it. Yet not only did they get clean away with it they used the event to embroil America in a disastrous war to take out one of Israel's most dangerous enemies. How bizarre is that? Yet to this day nobody in any official position questions it. If that doesn't demonstrate their almost supernatural power then what does?

Actually there was one attempt. And here's what happened. 'A revealing, four-part investigative series was aired by Fox News in December, 2001, dealing with the arrests of several hundred Israeli nationals as well as some of the incriminating circumstances surrounding their activities in the United States. In response, every major media outlet in America received a visit from Abraham Foxman, the head of the Anti-Defamation League. A phrase he used was, “What are you doing putting this stuff out there? You’re killing us!” Executives at the highest levels of the various networks were inundated with phone calls, letters and emails. Members of the most powerful Jewish groups in the country – ADL, AIPAC with its 60,000 members, and the misnamed Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America CAMERA – visited the White House and petitioned officials at the highest levels to close down investigations of the Israeli spies.'

The series was cancelled and removed from the Fox archives. Nobody else touched the subject.

I rest my case!

Sunday, 3 September 2017

Conservative journals

Are there any conservative English-language journals left? The Spectator had held on longer than most but has been careering over the "liberal" cliff in recent times. Take Carola Binney (please do!) who taught English in China for a year and who was absolutely horrified by the race realism racism there. This 'conservative' journalist, when seeking a pictorial exemplar for the word 'wife' chose......Michelle Obama!  Yes, a six-foot tall black American who looks like (and possibly is) a man was chosen rather than, well, a Chinese wife. Poor Carola was devastated by the eruption of revulsion that followed. 'Oh, so ugly!' 'Looks like a monkey'. 'So black!'

She was also astonished to learn that the Chinese believed Africans belonged in Africa. What a crazy thought! Shaking her head she writes that their 'ideas about racial hierarchies are not outdated pseudo-science but unquestioned belief'. (Note: 'pseudo-science' is libtard-speak for...'science'). This reached its logical conclusion when a prominent national politician asked rhetorically whether pressure to allow in Africans would 'change China from a yellow country to a yellow and black country'. In case there was any doubt about his own views he explained that Africans brought 'poverty, drugs, sexual assault and infectious diseases'. Which of course had the writer clutching her pearls in horror.

She ends up (after reciting a further series of shocking racist incidents) sternly warning the Chinese of a grim future unless 'they sort out their race problem'. No, you idiot, China does not have a race problem for the simple reason that 99% of them are of the same race. However they would have one in the unlikely event that they listened to you, you preening, sanctimonious, virtue-signalling, close-minded, non-thinking drone, comfortably enveloped in your personal cloud of invincible ignorance.

Anyway it doesn't matter because the Chinese are pouring huge resources into eugenics based on gene editing. They're about to produce a new Master Race of, I guess, highly intelligent, tall, blond blue-eyed, merciless sperg-like automatons....... while formerly White nations turn into Brazil.

An afterthought: That journalist doesn't do irony, does she? Because the article is just loaded with cultural imperialism. It hasn't dawned on her that, just like Cecil Rhodes, she's lecturing the natives on what's good and bad about their culture and prescribing remedies which reflect the latest Western fads. How ironic is that?

Wednesday, 30 August 2017

Never felt so pessimistic...

Not been posting much over the last week and it's mainly because I've been reading The Balfour Declaration by  American academic (((Jonathan Schneer)). It claims to be the most comprehensive study yet of that subject, the author having had access to newly-released documents and other hitherto unavailable sources. And indeed it is comprehensive, with footnotes and references taking up almost half of the text. 

Purporting to 'unravel the bewildering labyrinth that was British Middle East policy' leading to the eponymous Declaration, it does nothing of the sort. It is instead an exercise in obfuscation designed to minimise Zionist manipulation of Western democracies, diverting the blame for the problems that beset the region today onto Perfidious Albion. In fact it's borderline comical that the 'most comprehensive analysis ever' could totally ignore the Jewish machinations that induced the United States to enter WW1, Jewish agitation at the Paris Peace Conference following the war and the notorious 'stab in the back' on Germany (payoff for British support for the Zionist state).

Nothing new here of course but I'm writing to explain how the book has rendered me more pessimistic about the future than I've ever been. Despite the author's methodical obfuscations and gas-lighting the book nonetheless reveals the terrifying power of Organised Jewry and its ability to manipulate the dumb goyim. Tenacious, indefatigable, cohesive (despite disagreements on tactics), ruthless, intelligent, cunning and in possession of an awe-inspiring ability to marshal a dizzying array of resources and deploy them through inducement, blackmail, bribery, appeals to moral sentiment or whatever is deemed necessary.

Malynski, referring to the United States, wrote in La Démocratie Victorieuse 'The power to stir up a whole nation of solid, egotistical and utilitarian individuals, and to persuade them that their greatest privilege is to set out and get themselves killed at the uttermost ends of the earth, with no hope of gain for themselves or their children and almost without their understanding against or for whom they are fighting, or why, is a simply incredible phenomenon which makes one afraid when one comes to think about it.’ 

Indeed.

Here is but a single example of dozens which litter the book. Towards the end of the war the Allies were - with the utmost secrecy - exploring the possibility of a separate peace with Turkey. Towards this end the Americans sent a delegation to meet with the Turks. President Wilson's right-hand man (((Louis Brandeis))), fearing that the initiative could damage Zionist aspirations, secretly informed British Zionists who quickly intercepted the delegation in Gibraltar. And the rest as they say is history. There's a word for this: Treason. But as Sir John Harrington observed nearly 400 years ago 'Treason never prospers. What's the reason? For should it prosper none dare call it treason'. And indeed Brandeis subsequently prospered mightily, twenty years on the Supreme Court, even had a prominent university named after him. 

Why in a work of obfuscation would Schneer describe this incident and many more of a similar nature, incidents which in effect show Jews committing treason against their host countries? I can only assume that he sees nothing wrong with it and is unable to empathise with goyim who'd take a less charitable view. Right now the same Power is busily at work flooding our lands with Third World barbarians and encouraging our people to mate with them, debasing our culture and financial systems while step-by-step delegitimising and marginalising those few of us trying to fight back. (I note that Stormfront is the latest White site to be closed down). With the minds of our people so deformed by a century of non-stop brainwashing we now lie almost helpless before them.

I leave the final words to the great Revilo P Oliver. "But that seemingly despicable tribe, by arduous, intelligent, and indefatigable work for more than twenty-five centuries, has, through its own efforts, made itself the major world power today and is not far from its great objective, total ownership of the entire globe. History provides no parallel for that stupendous accomplishment. It must be regarded with respect, even awe."

To say I'm not optimistic would be an understatement.

Friday, 25 August 2017

Controlled opposition?

The charge of  'controlled opposition' is regularly hurled at a variety of sites and individuals on the Alt-Right, usually because of a disagreement over something inconsequential. Alex Jones is the exemplar.  Funded by Jews, he seeks to deflect attention away from Jewish involvement in 9/11 and his wife is, or was, Jewish. Anyway, it seems he's controlled opposition. Even the Daily Stormer's Andrew Anglin has been thus designated by several commentators on this site. 

It seems to me that those charges are laid if the target doesn't fully and unconditionally meet all the requirements demanded of a perfect WN. But remember perfect is the enemy of good enough. There will always be disagreements about facts, priorities, interpretations, measures to take etc. That's the nature of any movement. The criterion should be 'is he (or the site) helping or damaging the WN cause?'.

When assessed this way almost all charges of controlled opposition dissolve. Even in the case of Alex Jones. Despite carefully avoiding the Third Rail he has worked wonders in waking White people up. He has induced Whites to question and doubt the narrative they've been fed by schools, Government, MSM and Hollywood. Look, time and again he talks about “the elite”, “the global elites”, “globalists”, “international bankers”, “global conspiracy”, “the NWO” and the like. He says that every path leads to the House of Rothschild. Now I ask you, how much more explicit do you expect him to be? It doesn’t take a great leap of the imagination to establish the connection here. 

Or take someone like Stefan Molyneux. His mother was Jewish and he too tries to downplay the Jewish role in the war on Whites. But he has done, and continues to do, tremendous valuable work in waking Whites up to the terrible dangers posed by feminism, mass immigration, so-called liberalism and the White Privilege meme among others. I repeat, he (and other so-called controlled opposition sites like his) contributes greatly to waking White people up. And that is the main challenge facing WNs. Our biggest problem is that the overwhelming majority of Whites have no understanding - whatsoever - of the war being waged against them. They believe in what they see on TV and the movies, in what they learn in school and university and as such are like lemmings heading unknowingly towards the cliff.

Why would any 'controller' support such messages of awakening? Remember, and I'm living testimony to this fact, once you start pulling at the Narrative string the whole thing comes apart like a cheap suit. Any 'controller' worth his salt knows that and would avoid it like the plague. That's why Kevin Myers and James Damore were summarily fired.

So please, be judicious in deploying the charge of controlled opposition simply because the target's position doesn't conform exactly with yours. We are still a small minority and desperately need any help we can get in rousing Whites from their potentially fatal slumber. 

In similar vein it does not help our cause by categorising in scatter-gun fashion everyone who is against us as Jewish. To paraphrase one comment on the previous post on this blog: Hitler could have been partly Jewish because his grandfather was illegitimate and his biological father could therefore have been Jewish. Ipso facto Hitler was 'controlled opposition'. Can you see how ridiculous this stuff can get?

So please, welcome any help we can get. If you disagree with people like AJ or SM take the issue up with them in a constructive way in their blogs. And there are more than enough people of real Jewish heritage trying to take us down without assigning non-Jews to that category.

Forward!